Peer Review Process

Reviewers or Best Partners of the Journal of Defense Resources Education and Development are competent in the field of defense resources education and development which includes technology, human resources, regulation, monitoring and evaluation, and education and training. Able to work professionally by upholding the code of ethics of scientific publications as a Reviewer. The manuscript review process is as follows:

The incoming paper will be checked by the editor regarding the suitability of the article topic and checking Similarity / Plagiarism using Turnitin.
Reviewers review the manuscript in accordance with their scientific field. If the manuscript is not in accordance with their field of competence, they have the right to refuse the review process and transfer it to another reviewer who is more competent.
The review process uses a blind review, where the author does not know the identity of the reviewer.
The review process of one manuscript is carried out by at least 2 (two) reviewers and the process is carried out by the E-Journal system and / or correspondence.
Reviewers review the manuscript within a period of time (maximum 2 weeks) since the manuscript is received. The review process is based on the substance of the manuscript (article quality), among others:

Review the suitability of the problem, objectives, theory, method, and discussion
Reviewing the clarity of the presentation of figures, tables and diagrams
Reviewing the currency of the referenced literature
Reviewing factual errors
Evaluating the content of the manuscript
Reviewing the originality of the information
Examine whether the manuscript has been published elsewhere.
Assessing the comprehensiveness of the author's knowledge
Assessing the appropriateness of the title

If within that period the manuscript review has not been completed, the reviewer must confirm to the Editor-in-Chief.
During the manuscript review process, the reviewer provides an assessment of the manuscript through the checklist review form / list available on the available electronic journal application. If difficulties are found, reviewers can manually assess the manuscript on the paper sent by the Section Editor.
The reviewed manuscript is returned to the Section Editor or editorial secretariat.
The reviewer gives a decision on the review manuscript:
Accept Submission.
Revisions Required (the manuscript needs to be revised by the author and returned to the reviewer).
Decline Submission (the manuscript is rejected).
Assessing the significant impact of the research results